Firearms expert Stephen Gutowski shoots down 60 Minutes for putting ‘sensationalism over journalism’ in report on AR-15s

If media firefighters were smart, they’d run their sensationalist anti-gun hit pieces by Stephen Gutowski first. That would at least give them some semblance of professionalism and the appearance of caring about the truth.
Clearly they’re not smart. Because they keep pulling crap like this:
This morning, Gutowski shot Scott Pelley’s “60 Minutes” report full of holes:
You'll notice they compare .223 to 9mm but not to any other rifle rounds. They make getting shot with pistol calibers sound like a nice vacation. Getting shot is potentially life threatening regardless of the caliber.

71 people are talking about this
They also bizarrely imply that bleeding control techniques are necessary specifically because of AR-15s as though other gunshot wounds can't cause arterial bleeding. They then just assert mass shootings are on the rise without defining them or showing data to support the claim.

55 people are talking about this
It seems to do the job when plowing down kids in school, people praying in church or maybe even watching a movie? I get it’s not the most dangerous weapon, but it’s being used in a way that is dangerous.

34 people are talking about this
All sorts of weapons have been used in mass casualty attacks in the United States and throughout the world. That doesn't mean journalists should mislead people about them.

18 people are talking about this
It's powerful enough to be the preferred device for mass killing of humans. Which is its purpose. These things are made precisely for the purpose that mass-killers use them.

26 people are talking about this
The problem isn’t so much caliber as speed. Even taking a pro gun view of it, if a good guy brings a pistol to an AR15 fight, odd are they lose unless they’re a very skilled pistol shooter.

See DC Chucklehead's other Tweets
You could make the same argument for any rifle vs pistol scenario. Although, it is certainly not impossible to stop somebody armed with a rifle if you have a pistol. There are real world examples of that including just last week.

See Stephen Gutowski's other Tweets
Yes, this is true. The implication that AR-15s create special need for bleeding control over any other injury which causes arterial bleeding is wrong, though.

See Stephen Gutowski's other Tweets
Sidenote: Given the overpenitration and lack of bullet expansion, they appear to be using 9mm FMJs instead of hollow-point ammunition. Those rounds create a smaller wound path through ballistic gel. Makes the comparison to .223 all the more stark for the camera.

54 people are talking about this
Sure but that's not the argument they're making. They're arguing .223 is some sort of super round that's more powerful than anything else.

39 people are talking about this


As @StephenGutowski put it, this is sensationalism over journalism because they compare a rifle to a handgun. Why didn't they compare it to a 7.62 or .30-30?

33 people are talking about this

The only thing Jackie’s proving is that gun control advocates like those posing as Real Journalists™ at CBS News can’t be trusted to do honest reporting.
Firearms expert Stephen Gutowski shoots down 60 Minutes for putting ‘sensationalism over journalism’ in report on AR-15s Firearms expert Stephen Gutowski shoots down 60 Minutes for putting ‘sensationalism over journalism’ in report on AR-15s Reviewed by CUZZ BLUE on June 24, 2019 Rating: 5

No comments:

Powered by Blogger.